From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schwarz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1992
183 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 18, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment from 5 to 3 1/3 years; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

The indeterminate sentence of from 5 to 10 years incarceration imposed by the County Court was illegal. Pursuant to Penal Law § 70.05 (3) (c) the minimum term to which a juvenile offender such as the defendant may be sentenced is one-third of the maximum. Although no objection to the sentence was made to the sentencing court, we have undertaken this review because the defendant is entitled to be sentenced as provided by law (see, People v Fuller, 57 N.Y.2d 152).

We find no merit to the defendant's claim that the court abused its discretion in denying him youthful offender status. The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree. He was permitted to plead guilty to robbery in the first degree. The record indicates that although the defendant was only 15 years old at the time he committed the criminal acts which led to his conviction, he was nonetheless a knowing and willing participant in the robbery and murder of an unresisting victim. Consequently, in light of the favorable plea bargain and the defendant's culpable conduct, there is no reason to disturb the County Court's determination of this issue (see, CPL 720.10; People v. Raphael, 109 A.D.2d 899; People v Parris, 109 A.D.2d 853). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Balletta, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Schwarz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1992
183 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Schwarz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL SCHWARZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Marcia

In any event, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the application ( see, CPL…

People v. Geigel

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We find no merit to the defendant's claim that the court improvidently…