From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schwartzman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 24, 1969
249 N.E.2d 483 (N.Y. 1969)

Opinion

Submitted April 14, 1969

Decided April 24, 1969


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant contended that the District Attorney's cross-examination of him and admission of evidence of uncharged crimes denied defendant a fair trial and due process of law in violation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals considered this question and held that defendant's constitutional rights were not violated.


Summaries of

People v. Schwartzman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 24, 1969
249 N.E.2d 483 (N.Y. 1969)
Case details for

People v. Schwartzman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HERBERT S…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 24, 1969

Citations

249 N.E.2d 483 (N.Y. 1969)
249 N.E.2d 483
301 N.Y.S.2d 644

Citing Cases

People v. Syposs

n a jury verdict based on two alleged incidents of sexual activity with his 14-year-old daughter. We conclude…

People v. Ruiz

As such, no evidence was elicited which would have established the elements of duress (Penal Law § 40.00).…