From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1995
220 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cozier, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The police officer in question was justified in stopping the defendant since the officer possessed a reasonable suspicion that the defendant had committed a crime (see, People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223). Moreover, the officer was justified in pursuing the minimally-intrusive course of escorting the defendant back to the patrol car to be identified by the complainant (see, People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234). The defendant's further assertion that the trial court's instructions to the jury regarding his failure to testify deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Autry, 75 N.Y.2d 836), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v. Staley, 182 A.D.2d 846; People v. Davidson, 150 A.D.2d 717; People v. Ogle, 142 A.D.2d 608). Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1995
220 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Saunders

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO SAUNDERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 970