From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sastre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1996
226 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 1, 1996

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which imposed a mandatory surcharge; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

Having knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appellate review in connection with his plea agreement, the defendant is now foreclosed from challenging the adequacy of the procedures the court used to determine the amount of restitution ( see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Brakas, 204 A.D.2d 474).

However, as the People concede, the County Court erred in directing the defendant to both make restitution and pay a mandatory surcharge ( see, People v. Bailey, 209 A.D.2d 709; People v. Willis, 168 A.D.2d 470; People v. Turco, 130 A.D.2d 785). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, Sullivan, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sastre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1996
226 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Sastre

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JORGE SASTRE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 775