Opinion
March 29, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5) (see, People v. Shurka, 191 A.D.2d 724 [decided herewith]). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
I find that the statements made by the defendant to his codefendant in Hebrew were obtained from the defendant in violation of his right to counsel and were therefore inadmissible on the People's direct case. Since the admission of these statements was not harmless error, I would reverse the defendant's conviction and grant him a new trial (see, People v. Shurka, 191 A.D.2d 724 [decided herewith]).