From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santos-Mispas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2007
38 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2004-07085.

March 27, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), rendered July 30, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Janet A. Gandolfo, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Florio, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his justification defense was not disproven beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v Johnson, 302 AD2d 539). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of justification and to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power ( see CPL 470.15), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

The defendant's claim that the court considered improper factors in imposing sentence is also unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Ponder, 1 AD3d 616 [2003]). In any event, the claim is without merit ( see People v Harrison, 188 AD2d 374, 375, affd 82 NY2d 693; see generally People v Notey, 72 AD2d 279, 282-283). The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Santos-Mispas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2007
38 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Santos-Mispas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAMON SANTOS-MISPAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2782
831 N.Y.S.2d 344

Citing Cases

People v. Brokenbough

The defendant's contention that the County Court considered improper factors in imposing sentence is…

People v. Aviles

The defendant's contention that the sentencing court considered improper factors in imposing sentence is…