From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 4, 2005
14 A.D.3d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

4951

January 4, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered October 10, 2002, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Williams, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


While it appears that defendant served a pro se motion for assignment of new counsel upon the People, the record does not establish that defendant ever filed that motion with the court. Even assuming that defendant filed the motion, he abandoned it by failing to call the court's attention to the fact that the motion remained unresolved, having had the opportunity to do so at the subsequent guilty plea and sentencing proceedings ( see e.g. People v. Brimage, 214 AD2d 454, lv denied 86 NY2d 732). In any event, the record clearly establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea ( see People v. Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404), and that the motion was patently meritless.


Summaries of

People v. Santos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 4, 2005
14 A.D.3d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Santos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL SANTOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 4, 2005

Citations

14 A.D.3d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
786 N.Y.S.2d 742

Citing Cases

People v. Forney

Indeed, since Forney does not assert that Judge Saitta denied his motion, but merely complains that the judge…

People v. Baker

In any event, any potential for input from defendant was outweighed by valid concerns for the witnesses'…