From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santiago

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1978
379 N.E.2d 1138 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued May 3, 1978

Decided June 13, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, IRVING KIRSCHENBAUM, J.

Lynn Fahey, William E. Hellerstein and William J. Gallagher for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Ann Elizabeth Lewis and Peter L. Zimroth of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The asserted errors in the charge to the jury, if errors they were, have not been preserved by proper protest for our review. We find no error in the failure of the People to produce the informer-witness. The identity of the informer, who was not an eyewitness to the criminal transactions, was disclosed to defense counsel. His disappearance six months before trial had not been procured by the People, and the trial court found acceptable the efforts made by the People in response to defendant's midtrial request that he be located.

We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Santiago

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1978
379 N.E.2d 1138 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Santiago

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HECTOR SANTIAGO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 13, 1978

Citations

379 N.E.2d 1138 (N.Y. 1978)
379 N.E.2d 1138
408 N.Y.S.2d 7

Citing Cases

People v. Minor

Under such circumstances, the defendant was not entitled to a missing witness charge, as there was no…

People v. McKinney

He has failed, however, to demonstrate that the missing informer, a longtime friend, would have provided…