From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2006
30 A.D.3d 1129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8673.

June 6, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered March 10, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of tampering with physical evidence in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 1½ to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Gayle Pollack of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Vincent Rivellese of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


Since defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim turns on matters outside the record, including counsel's specific advice to defendant concerning the immigration consequences of his plea, it is not reviewable on direct appeal and would require a further record to be developed by way of a CPL 440.10 motion ( see People v. Love, 57 NY2d 998). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant has failed to demonstrate that counsel provided improper advice ( see People v. Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404; compare People v. McDonald, 1 NY3d 109).

We perceive no basis upon which to reduce defendant's conviction to a lesser offense ( see People v. Velasquez, 25 AD3d 501).


Summaries of

People v. Santer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2006
30 A.D.3d 1129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Santer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANTZ SANTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 1129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4350
816 N.Y.S.2d 444

Citing Cases

Simms v. Moscicki

Such claims cannot be raised on direct appeal, but rather must be made through a Section 440.10 motion under…

People v. Michael

As defendant's allegations in support of the motion were neither conceded by the People to be true nor…