Opinion
December 3, 1984
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.).
The issues raised by defendant are either not preserved for appellate review or are without merit. Lazer, J.P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
People v. Santana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Summaries of
People v. Santana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1984
106 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for
People v. Santana
Case Details
Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL SANTANA…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 3, 1984
Citations
106 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Citing Cases
People v. Hartman
Further, defendant made no objection to the charge and, in any event, it was proper in all respects. We have…