From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sandy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 1990
164 A.D.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

August 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

Because the prosecutor at the hearing held in November 1989 was unable to recall his reasons for challenging five black prospective jurors, the People failed to meet their burden of overcoming the presumption of discrimination found by this court (see, People v Jackson, 152 A.D.2d 706; People v Mims, 149 A.D.2d 948; People v Knight, 144 A.D.2d 1020). Brown, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sandy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 1990
164 A.D.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Sandy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME SANDY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 1990

Citations

164 A.D.2d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

As for the third male, the case law is clear that a failure of memory signifies that the party who struck the…

People v. Wilson

We agree with Supreme Court. When the prosecutor was unable to recall why he had exercised a peremptory…