From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1987
128 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 16, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not establish that the court imposed the sentence that it did because the defendant chose to go to trial (see, People v. Pena, 50 N.Y.2d 400, cert denied 449 U.S. 1087; cf., People v. Patterson, 106 A.D.2d 520).

The sentence imposed under the circumstances of this case was appropriate and did not constitute an abuse of discretion (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1987
128 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH SANDERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. John

The papers submitted by the defendant, in support of his CPL 440.10 motion failed, as a matter of law, to…

People v. Aguilera

However, we conclude that the vast majority of the prosecutor's allegedly objectionable remarks constituted…