Opinion
June 2, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.).
The trial court properly instructed the jury to consider only competent evidence, to consider the complainant's testimony regarding what an uncalled counselor allegedly told her only as it might pertain to credibility determinations, and to refrain from speculation (see, e.g., People v. Jackson, 65 N.Y.2d 265, 271).
Defendant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct in summation are for the most part unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05). In any event, as defense counsel's summation vigorously attacked the complainant's testimony in terms of a "fabrication," the prosecutor's responsive comments on credibility, although perhaps better expressed in more moderate terms, were not so prejudicial as to require a new trial (see, People v. Castillo, 16 A.D.2d 235, 236-237, affd 12 N.Y.2d 732).
We have considered defendant's remaining claims and find them to be both unpreserved and without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.