Opinion
December 11, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Max Sayah, J., at hearing; Nicholas Iacovetta, J., at jury trial)
The hearing court properly concluded that probable cause existed for defendant's arrest. The arresting officer testified as to the details of the description contained in the radio transmission from the undercover officer. Upon receiving the transmission, he responded to the identified location, where he arrested defendant, who was the only person fully fitting the description. Thus, the arresting officer implicitly provided sufficient basis upon which the hearing court could independently conclude that probable cause existed for defendant's arrest ( see, People v. Brown, 238 A.D.2d 204), unlike the situation presented where the People completely fail to establish the content of the description ( see, People v. Rivera, 187 A.D.2d 258). Defendant's remaining challenges to the suppression ruling are speculative attacks on the officer's credibility, and we reject them as unsupported by the record.
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.