From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Salem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 29, 1991
169 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 29, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.).


The court was not obliged to sentence defendant, who had breached the plea agreement by absconding and committing further crimes, to the originally promised sentence of probation. (People v Asencio, 143 A.D.2d 917, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 889.) Nor, under the circumstances presented, and in view of defendant's prior criminal history, do we find the imposition of the maximum sentence to constitute an abuse of discretion.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Salem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 29, 1991
169 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Salem

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NADIM SALEM, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Maietta

In fact, the only question raised about the re-arrest condition was defense counsel's query to Criminal Term…