From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. S. Tax Comm

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1926
243 N.Y. 543 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued May 27, 1926

Decided June 8, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( Frederic J. Merriman of counsel), for appellant.

John M. Cantwell for respondent.


The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We do not consider what effect, if any, chapter 180 of the Laws of 1810 and chapter 257 of the Laws of 1824 might have upon the conclusion reached by us. The case was not tried upon the theory that either statute was material, nor is such a claim argued before us by the Attorney-General.

HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. S. Tax Comm

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1926
243 N.Y. 543 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

People v. S. Tax Comm

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. RUTLAND RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 1926

Citations

243 N.Y. 543 (N.Y. 1926)
154 N.E. 597

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Gilchrist

( People ex rel. United Natural Gas Co. v. Priest, 152 App. Div. 249.) The case of People ex rel. Rutland…

Maloney v. Hearst Hotels Corporation

Section 761 of the Greater New York Charter (Laws of 1901, ch. 466) was not relied upon in the courts below…