From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 15, 1988

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Celli, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: On this record, it has not been demonstrated that there are sufficient "compelling" factors to warrant dismissal of the indictment (CPL 210.40; People v. Rickert, 58 N.Y.2d 122; People v. Clayton, 41 A.D.2d 204). While the question of whether to dismiss an indictment in the interest of justice is addressed to the discretion of the court, that discretion is not absolute (People v. Hirsch, 85 A.D.2d 902). The trial court's discretion should be "`exercised sparingly'" and only in that "`rare'" and "`unusual'" case when it "`cries out for fundamental justice beyond the confines of conventional considerations'" (People v. Insignares, 109 A.D.2d 221, 234; see also, People v. Belkota, 50 A.D.2d 118, 120).


Summaries of

People v. Rucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Rucker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. DOYLE L. RUCKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Wright

"On this record, it has not been demonstrated that there are sufficient `compelling' factors to warrant…

People v. Wise

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Monroe…