From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosario

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Jan 13, 2017
52 N.Y.S.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

No. 570745/12.

01-13-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander ROSARIO, Defendant–Appellant.


Order (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), entered October 3, 2011, affirmed.

The record supports the level three sex offender adjudication. Defendant is subject to the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, which results in a level three offender adjudication independent of any point assessment (see People v. Fair, 129 AD3d 617 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 910 [2015] ; People v. Judd, 29 AD3d 431 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 709 [2006] ). Defendant's age, 67 years at the time of the hearing, does not warrant a downward departure, given that defendant committed his most recent sex offense at the age of 66 and his prior felony sex crime at age 60 (see People v. McFarland, 120 AD3d 1121, 1122 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1053 [2014] ; People v. Beyah, 76 AD3d 917 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 716 [2010] ). The impact that defendant's level three designation had on his placement in a treatment program had no bearing on defendant's risk of a repeat offense or the threat he posed to the public safety (see Correction Law § 168–l[5] ; People v. McFarland, 120 AD3d at 1122 ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rosario

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Jan 13, 2017
52 N.Y.S.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

People v. Rosario

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander ROSARIO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

Citations

52 N.Y.S.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)