Opinion
April 20, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.)
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the court erred in summarily denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress a confirmatory identification by an undercover officer as the fruit of an illegal arrest. However, the factual allegations made in support of his omnibus motion were insufficient to either warrant suppression of the identification or to require a hearing on the matter ( see, People v. Mendoza, 82 N.Y.2d 415; see also, People v. Hightower, 85 N.Y.2d 988; CPL 710.60).
The prosecutor's comments made during summation do not require reversal ( see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Ashwal, 39 N.Y.2d 105; People v. Walker, 207 A.D.2d 811).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.