From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1991
176 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Howard Bell, J.).


Defendant and his friend went to defendant's former girlfriend's apartment on April 14, 1988. She was home with her two sisters, her current boyfriend, Damte Zebulun and two of Zebulun's friends, Robert Jones and Sean Lisbon. Defendant and Zebulun argued and defendant left. Defendant returned two more times and on the last time argued again with Zebulun. The two groups of friends went outside to fight. When Jones emerged from the building, he saw defendant pull a gun from his waistband. Zebulun also saw defendant pull a gun and start to fire at him. As Zebulun ran, defendant chased him and continued to fire. A bullet grazed Zebulun. Lisbon was shot in the head and killed.

Officers investigated the crime scene and Officer Del Castella attempted to locate the defendant for two weeks to no avail. Defendant was finally arrested at his sister's apartment on April 29, 1988.

While defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, a review of such evidence, in a light most favorable to the People and in light of the fact that the jury's determination of witness credibility is entitled to great deference (People v. Patterson, 155 A.D.2d 363), demonstrates that defendant's guilt of the crimes he was convicted of was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. While there may have been some minor inconsistencies in the testimony, they only concerned insignificant aspects of the case and were clearly considered by the jury.

Defendant also maintains that the prosecutor improperly commented on his evidence of flight, and that the IAS court should have, sua sponte, instructed the jury on the value of evidence of flight. These claims are unpreserved and we decline to address them. (CPL 470.05.) However, were we to consider them in the interest of justice, we would find them to be meritless. The prosecutor properly commented upon this evidence as indicative of defendant's consciousness of guilt. (See, e.g., People v. Yazum, 13 N.Y.2d 302, 304.) Also, this was not a case in which the prosecutor overemphasized the "flight" evidence such that the court should have, sua sponte, instructed the jurors of the evidence's value. (Cf., People v. Ali, 146 A.D.2d 636, 638.)

We have examined appellant's other contention and find it to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1991
176 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Rosa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALDO ROSA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 311

Citing Cases

People v. Valerio

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly failed to charge the jury regarding the weakness…

People v. John

The defendant never requested such a charge or objected to the court's failure to so charge (see, CPL 470.05;…