From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1994
210 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 19, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the police had probable cause to arrest him. It is well settled that a police officer may arrest a person without a warrant when the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed a crime (see, People v Cruz, 191 A.D.2d 507). Here, the information leading to the defendant's arrest was given to the police by a friend of the defendant and was corroborated by an independent investigation. Thus, sufficient probable cause existed for the defendant's arrest. Moreover, his statements, which were made during the course of a subsequent custodial interrogation at the station house, following a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights, were admissible.

The defendant's contention that the sentence is excessive is without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rooney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1994
210 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Rooney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DENNIS ROONEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 979

Citing Cases

People v. Murray

In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit since the hearing record demonstrates that an…