From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds (see, CPL 30.30). The People's delay in producing Rosario material, namely, the transcript of the Grand Jury minutes, did not affect the People's readiness to proceed (see, People v Anderson, 66 N.Y.2d 529, 536-537; People v Kindlon, 217 A.D.2d 793; cf., People v McKenna, 76 N.Y.2d 59, 61). We further conclude that imposition of the maximum term of imprisonment for felony driving while intoxicated was neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Roney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Roney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT RONEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1114 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 705

Citing Cases

People v. Tingue

Generally, periods of delay occurring after the People announce their readiness are not chargeable to the…

People v. Pearson

The People properly disclosed that Rosario material after jury selection and before the first witness was…