From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Romanick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 12, 1989

Appeal from the Genesee County Court, Morton, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's argument that the People failed to establish probable cause for his arrest is without merit. The People introduced the testimony of both the transmitting and receiving officers in compliance with People v Lypka ( 36 N.Y.2d 210, 213-214; see also, People v Landy, 59 N.Y.2d 369, 375-376). The contents of the message were proven and consisted of a detailed description of the vehicle, including the license number. This information was provided by citizens based upon their personal observations (see, People v Ramsey, 140 A.D.2d 638, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 923).

The court's refusal to suppress the identification of defendant after a hearing was correct. The witness's viewing of defendant outside the courthouse was inadvertent and not arranged by police (see, People v Maddox, 139 A.D.2d 597, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 862; People v Brown, 126 A.D.2d 657, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 703).


Summaries of

People v. Romanick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Romanick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND ROMANICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
543 N.Y.S.2d 801