From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2005
17 A.D.3d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-07094.

April 25, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered August 6, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Steven R. Bernhard of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's allegedly improper comments during summation requires reversal of his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Tonge, 93 NY2d 838; People v. Smith, 13 AD3d 401, 402, lv denied 4 NY3d 803), and in any event, is without merit ( see People v. Acevedo, 2 AD3d 452; People v. Myers, 305 AD2d 429).


Summaries of

People v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2005
17 A.D.3d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RMELL ROGERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 917