Opinion
November 15, 1985
Appeal from the Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.
Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction of second degree burglary defendant raises several claims. Only one merits discussion. Since the evidence which defendant sought to suppress was seized from two homes in which defendant had no proprietary interest, defendant had no expectation of privacy in either premises and no standing to raise the issue (see, United States v Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83). We also note that one of the items was seized pursuant to a valid search warrant and the occupants of each home consented to the search in any event. We have considered defendant's remaining claims and find them lacking in merit.