From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1992
188 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 21, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gloria Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). The defendant's contention that his counsel failed to provide "meaningful representation" is not supported by the record (see, People v Jackson, 70 N.Y.2d 768). The defendant has failed to show that, but for counsel's allegedly deficient performance, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted upon going to trial (see, People v Hayes, 186 A.D.2d 268). Moreover, the defense counsel's failure to actively participate in the defendant's application to withdraw his plea did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel considering that the defendant was provided an adequate opportunity to present his contentions and counsel's lack of participation worked no discernable prejudice (see, People v Bell, 141 A.D.2d 749). Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1992
188 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 846

Citing Cases

People v. Cifonelli

Where a defendant, on the advice of counsel, has entered a plea of guilty and reaped the benefits of a…

People v. Tavarez

Also, in New York, a defendant must satisfy the "prejudice" requirement by showing that absent counsel's…