From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 2002
299 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-08025

Submitted October 10, 2002.

November 4, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered August 29, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Schwed Zucker, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Michael Schwed of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Jeanette Lifschitz, and Josette Simmons-McGhee of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the trial court misapplied the law on circumstantial evidence in finding him guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10).

The trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds, pursuant to CPL 30.30. The period of time from the issuance of the bench warrant to his subsequent arrest was not chargeable to the People (see CPL 30.30[c][ii]; People v. Sigismundi, 89 N.Y.2d 587; People v. Johnson, 271 A.D.2d 457).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., S. MILLER, FRIEDMANN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 2002
299 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. LOUIE RODRIGUEZ, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 165