From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 13, 1990
165 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 13, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Frank Diaz, J.


On November 22, 1987, uniformed police officers observed a vehicle pass a red light on Sedgwick Avenue in Bronx County. The officers turned on their siren and turret lights, pursued this vehicle for some distance, eventually coming to a stop partially on the sidewalk of Popham Avenue. Defendant answered some questions and then attempted to flee, but was apprehended by the officers who had given chase, assisted by additional officers who had been summoned to assist them. On the front seat of the vehicle, officers observed, in plain view, packages containing a white, powdery substance, which upon analysis proved to be cocaine.

The officers had a legitimate right to pursue and stop the vehicle for a traffic violation, and their observation of the narcotics in question was inadvertent, unplanned and unanticipated. (People v. Jackson, 41 N.Y.2d 146.)

"One has no legitimate expectation of privacy in locations in a car which are observable by passersby. Accordingly, an officer's simply peering inside an automobile does not constitute a search". (People v. Class, 63 N.Y.2d 491, 494.)

We find defendant's remaining contention to be either unpreserved or without merit.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 13, 1990
165 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANILLO RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 13, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 251

Citing Cases

People v. Tyner

en considered in conjunction with all the other attendant circumstances could and did (see, People v…

People v. May

The suppression court's findings are amply supported by the record. The deputy was authorized to stop…