From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 951 KA 04-02293.

September 28, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered June 4, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree.

EDWARD J. NOWAK, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM CLAUSS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (KELLY CHRISTINE WOLFORD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Before: Present — Martoche, J.P., Lunn, Peradotto and Green, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law, the indictment is dismissed and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [depraved indifference murder]). Defendant admitted at trial that he killed the victim but contended that he did so in self-defense, and the jury acquitted him of intentional murder in the second degree (§ 125.25 [1]). Defendant contends that there is no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences that could have led the jury to conclude that his conduct was reckless rather than intentional, particularly in view of the number and severity of the wounds inflicted on the victim. We agree ( see People v Hawthorne, 35 AD3d 499, 501-502, lv denied 8 NY3d 946; People v Breedlove, 26 AD3d 641, 642, lv denied 6 NY3d 846; see also People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 216; see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The evidence at trial included forensic testimony establishing that defendant stabbed the victim eight times and that four stab wounds punctured her lungs and two struck her heart. Indeed, as the Court of Appeals has noted, "depraved indifference murder may not be properly charged in the overwhelming majority of homicides that are prosecuted in New York" ( People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 270, rearg denied 3 NY3d 767). We thus conclude that the depraved indifference count of the indictment must be dismissed ( see generally People v McMillon, 31 AD3d 136, 139-141, lv denied 7 NY3d 815).


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD R. RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7123
842 N.Y.S.2d 631

Citing Cases

United States v. Ashburn

(See id. at 38, 40.) Ashburn thereby seeks to distinguish these facts from state court decisions affirming…

Suarez v. Byrne

Matter of Suarez v Byrne, 40 AD3d 546, affirmed. Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City ( Mark W.…