From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 4, 1963
38 Misc. 2d 949 (N.Y. App. Term 1963)

Opinion

January 4, 1963

Appeal from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County, SAMUEL J. OHRINGER, J.

Isidore Dollinger, District Attorney ( Walter E. Dillon and Bertram R. Gelfand of counsel), for appellant.

Benedict A. Caiola for respondent.


The police officer, authorized by the warrant to search both the defendant's premises and his person for written records of illegal gambling activity, was admitted to the apartment by the defendant's daughter freely. No deceit or trickery was used to gain admittance. The officer fully satisfied all constitutional requirements when, having been admitted to the apartment in the circumstances stated, he promptly identified himself to the defendant and exhibited the warrant to him before undertaking the search authorized by it. Since there was no forcible entry, neither section 799 of the Code of Criminal Procedure nor Miller v. United States ( 357 U.S. 301) relied on by the defendant, is applicable. The entry into the apartment having been lawful, there was no ground for suppressing the fruits of the search.

The order should be reversed on the law and the facts and motion denied.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., HECHT and TILZER, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 4, 1963
38 Misc. 2d 949 (N.Y. App. Term 1963)
Case details for

People v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. EMILIANO RODRIGUEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 4, 1963

Citations

38 Misc. 2d 949 (N.Y. App. Term 1963)
237 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

United States v. Dross

N.Y. Code Crim.Proc. § 799. See People v. Rodriguez, 38 Misc.2d 949, 237 N.Y.S.2d 924. See People v. Johnson,…

People v. King

There appears to be no reported case law in this jurisdiction which addresses itself directly to the question…