Opinion
November 14, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
A showup procedure which takes place shortly after the crime and in close proximity to the scene of a crime does not deny the defendant his right to due process (see, People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541; People v. Riley, 70 N.Y.2d 523; People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 1023; People v. Redd, 137 A.D.2d 770). In view of the close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime, the defendant's arrest did not render the subsequent showup constitutionally infirm (see, People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541, 543, supra; People v. Brnja, 50 N.Y.2d 366; People v. Rowlett, 193 A.D.2d 768).
In light of our determination, the defendant's remaining contentions need not be addressed. Bracken, J.P., Miller, Lawrence and Santucci, JJ., concur.