From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1998
251 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 11, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Donati, J.).


The trial court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds since the People did not exceed the six-month statutory limit. The sole interval at issue is the 28-day period from January 10, 1995 to February 7, 1995. Even assuming, arguendo, that the People were not ready on January 10th, their submission of a certificate of readiness on January 13th tolled the "speedy trial clock" from the date of filing until the next adjourned date, which was February 7th (People v. Stirrup, 91 N.Y.2d 434). It is undisputed that once this period is excluded, the total amount of includable delay does not reach the statutory limit.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1998
251 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARROLL ROBINSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 110 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 26

Citing Cases

People v. Teachey

That original Anderson decision would have overruled Sykes.Stirrup (supra) pulled back that broad extension…

People v. Teachey

Reid, in fact, explicitly distinguished its particular circumstances from the general rule of People ex rel.…