From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 2004
3 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2707.

Decided January 20, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered March 22, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Christopher P. Marinelli, for Respondent.

Robert E. Carrigan, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Sullivan, Rosenberger, JJ.


Although the court's participation in examining witnesses was extensive, it was within reasonable bounds and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The court did not take on either the function or appearance of an advocate ( see People v. Arnold, 98 N.Y.2d 63, 67; People v. Yut Wai Tom, 53 N.Y.2d 44).

The court properly exercised its discretion in imposing fair restrictions on cross-examination, primarily involving matters of form rather than substance, that did not interfere with defendant's defense ( see Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 678-679).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 2004
3 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH ROBINSON, A/K/A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 618

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The precluded inquiries were improper in form or irrelevant, and defendant received ample opportunity to…

People v. Thompson

While the court's participation in examining witnesses was unduly extensive, the court did not take on…