From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1988
144 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 7, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.).


Ordered that the sentence and amended judgment are affirmed.

The defendant contends on appeal that the sentences imposed by the court, in compliance with the terms of his negotiated plea bargain, constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional proscriptions (NY Const, art I, § 5; US Const 8th Amend). "[O]rdinarily a sentence that is within statutory limits does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment absent exceptional circumstances (People v. Jones, 39 N.Y.2d 694)" (People v. Albano, 124 A.D.2d 739, 740, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 824; People v. Medina, 140 A.D.2d 549). After reviewing the record on this appeal, we find no exceptional circumstances to support such a claim. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1988
144 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARRON ROBERTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, we do not find that the imposition of the maximum allowable term was…

People v. Spencer

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.). Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, People…