From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2023
185 N.Y.S.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

1 Ind. No. 2443–15 Case No. 2019–04425

04-11-2023

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cesar RIVERA, Defendant–Appellant.

Caprice R. Jenerson, Office of Appellate Defender, New York (Rosemary Herbert of counsel), and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York (Tyler Good–Cohn of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine Triffon of counsel), for respondent.


Caprice R. Jenerson, Office of Appellate Defender, New York (Rosemary Herbert of counsel), and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York (Tyler Good–Cohn of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Katherine Triffon of counsel), for respondent.

Webber, J.P., Oing, Singh, Gonza´lez, Mendez, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered on June 28, 2019, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). Defendant's intent and his agreement with his coconspirators, rather than his mere awareness of the conspiracy, could be readily inferred from the totality of the circumstantial evidence, which excluded reasonable innocent explanations. "While each link in the chain of circumstances might have an innocent explanation when viewed in isolation, the evidence, viewed as a whole, supported the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the drug conspiracy" ( People v. Ramirez, 33 A.D.3d 460, 460, 826 N.Y.S.2d 184 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 7 N.Y.3d 928, 827 N.Y.S.2d 697, 860 N.E.2d 999 [2006] ). The People's case did not depend solely or primarily on lyrics contained in a video authored by defendant. The jury could have reasonably concluded, given the context of the other evidence in the case, that these lyrics were case-specific factual admissions instead of fiction or artistic expression.

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2023
185 N.Y.S.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cesar RIVERA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 11, 2023

Citations

185 N.Y.S.3d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Citing Cases

People v. McGregor

Viewed as a whole, the evidence supported the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the firearm…