From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2014
123 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

13870 1464/95

12-30-2014

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Manuel Rivera, Defendant-Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Joshua L. Haber of counsel), for respondent.


, Moskowitz, Richter, Feinman, Clark, JJ.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Epstein of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Joshua L. Haber of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court's determination that defendant is subject to the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, which results in a level three adjudication independent of any point assessments. The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were outweighed by the seriousness of defendant's underlying crimes and his pattern of recidivism.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 30, 2014

CLERK


Summaries of

People v. Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2014
123 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Manuel Rivera…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 9057
999 N.Y.S.2d 76

Citing Cases

People v. Simmons

Defendant's challenges to his adjudication are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of…

People v. Bonnemere

Although an exceptional response to sex offender treatment may qualify as a mitigating factor not accounted…