From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Riggs

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Dec 28, 1972
291 N.E.2d 246 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-67 Judgment affirmed.

December 28, 1972.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Will County; the Hon. MICHAEL A. ORENIC, Judge, presiding.

Bruce Stratton, of Defender Project, of Ottawa, for appellant.

Louis R. Bertani, State's Attorney, of Joliet, for the People.


The defendant James Riggs appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Will County denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act.

The record shows that defendant filed a post-conviction petition pro se. Counsel was appointed who, though given time to file any amendments desired, elected to stand on the original petition. The only issue raised by defendant on this appeal relates to the absence from the record of a certificate of counsel as required by Supreme Court Rule 651(c). (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 110A, sec. 651(c); See also People v. Lampson ( 8 Ill. App.3d 544).) The merits of the petition are not at issue on this appeal. During the appeal the People moved for leave to file in this court an appropriate certificate of appointed counsel pursuant to the procedure suggested by the Supreme Court in People v. Harris, 50 Ill.2d 31. We allowed the motion and having examined the verified certificate of counsel find that there was compliance with Rule 651(c). The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

ALLOY, P.J., and SCOTT, J., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Riggs

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Dec 28, 1972
291 N.E.2d 246 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
Case details for

People v. Riggs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES RIGGS…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District

Date published: Dec 28, 1972

Citations

291 N.E.2d 246 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
291 N.E.2d 246

Citing Cases

People v. Enyart

Appellant concedes in his brief that the report of proceedings was received by counsel and entered into…