From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 28, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.).


Ordered that the motion is granted, Thomas Andrew O'Keefe is relieved as attorney for the defendant, and he is directed to turn over all the papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Kevin Gilleece of 399 Knollwood Road, Suite 206, White Plains, N.Y., 10603, is assigned to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the People are directed to furnish a copy of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that the new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the defendant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order and the People shall serve and file their brief within 120 days of the date of this decision and order; by prior decision and order of this Court, the defendant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers (including the typewritten stenographic minutes) and on the typewritten briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California ( 386 U.S. 738, supra), in which he seeks to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal. Annexed to his Anders brief are copies of letters from the defendant outlining several issues which the defendant wanted counsel to raise on appeal. In his Anders brief, however, assigned counsel discussed the defendant's points in detail and rejected them as lacking in merit. In so doing, counsel disparaged the claims his client wanted him to address and "for all practical purposes, precluded his client from presenting them effectively in a pro se brief" (People v. Vasquez, 70 N.Y.2d 1, 4; People v. Duncan, 196 A.D.2d 827; People v. Faulk, 185 A.D.2d 991; People v. Brewley, 178 A.D.2d 483, 484; People v. Williams, 176 A.D.2d 372, 373). Under the circumstances, the motion of the defendant's assigned counsel is granted and new counsel is assigned. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Richards

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GILES RICHARDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 318

Citing Cases

People v. James

The defendant's counsel has submitted a brief in which he concludes that there are no nonfrivolous issues to…