From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2003
309 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1786

October 9, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered January 30, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Eli R. Koppel, for respondent.

Michael J.Z. Mannheimer, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. "This Court has repeatedly rejected defendant's argument that the radio transmissions from the undercover officer, relating that a `positive buy' involving two described individuals had transpired, were insufficient to establish probable cause to arrest defendant because they did not spell out defendant's role in the drug transaction [citations omitted]" (People v. Harris, 305 A.D.2d 282).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2003
309 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEITH REYES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 503

Citing Cases

People v. Oglesby

Here, under the fellow officer rule, the arresting officers were entitled to presume that the information…

People v. Oglesby

Here, under the fellow officer rule, the arresting officers were entitled to presume that the information…