From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2013
103 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-27

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Thomas RERA, appellant.

Scott Lockwood, North Babylon, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.


Scott Lockwood, North Babylon, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Iliou, J.), rendered October 6, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

“In determining whether a defendant violated a condition of his or her release under the judicial diversion program, the court may conduct a summary hearing consistent with due process and sufficient to satisfy the court that the defendant has, in fact, violated the condition” (CPL 216.05[9] [b]; see People v. Fiammegta, 14 N.Y.3d 90, 96, 896 N.Y.S.2d 735, 923 N.E.2d 1123). Here, the County Court conducted a hearing at which it received a report and sworn testimony from a case manager for the judicial diversion program detailing the defendant's violations of the conditions of his release under that program. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing was conducted in accordance with the requirements of due process.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Rera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2013
103 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Rera

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Thomas RERA, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
959 N.Y.S.2d 672
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1291

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the right to counsel of his choice during a judicial…

People v. Harris

05[2]; People v Cooney, 120 AD3d 1445, 1446; People v Metovic, 48 AD3d 832). Contrary to the defendant's…