From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Reilly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1979
392 N.E.2d 1246 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1979

Decided June 12, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH J. KUNZEMAN, J.

William H. Roth and William E. Hellerstein for appellant. John J. Santucci, District Attorney (Aley Z. Alexander of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Viewing the evidence at trial in the light most favorable to the defendant, we find that the record affords no basis for a charge as to justification. (Penal Law, § 35.15.) Thus, it was not error for the Trial Judge to refuse defendant's request to so charge the jury. (See People v Stevenson, 31 N.Y.2d 108, 112-113.)

In our view, defendant's objections during the cross-examination of a codefendant at trial, having made no reference to the issue now raised, were not sufficient to preserve that issue: namely, whether the prosecutor's allegedly improper cross-examination unduly prejudiced him.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Reilly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 12, 1979
392 N.E.2d 1246 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

People v. Reilly

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRIAN REILLY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 12, 1979

Citations

392 N.E.2d 1246 (N.Y. 1979)
392 N.E.2d 1246
419 N.Y.S.2d 63

Citing Cases

People v. Valentin

The defendant's claim that the evidence of physical injury was insufficient to support the conviction for…

People v. Sloan

The defendant's claim that the evidence of physical injury was insufficient to support the conviction for…