Opinion
June 4, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's sole contention is that the trial court erred in denying the defense counsel's challenge for cause of a juror whose brother was a police officer. A challenge to a prospective juror on the ground that the juror has a state of mind that is likely to preclude him or her from rendering an impartial verdict should only be granted if there is a substantial risk that the juror's state of mind will affect his or her ability to discharge his responsibilities, a determination committed to the discretion of the trial court, with its unique opportunities to evaluate the prospective jurors during voir dire ( see, People v. Williams, 63 N.Y.2d 882; People v. Davis, 221 A.D.2d 653; People v. Campbell, 216 A.D.2d 482). The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defense counsel's challenge.
Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.