From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Regins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 21, 1994
203 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 21, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene Silverman, J.).


Defendant's contention that the trial court's Sandoval ruling, which allowed inquiry into the sentence defendant received for a prior conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree, as well as the fact of the conviction itself, was an abuse of discretion is not preserved for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05; People v Medina, 171 A.D.2d 559, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 924), and any event, is without merit (People v Rodena, 170 A.D.2d 418, 419, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 966).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Regins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 21, 1994
203 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Regins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUCY REGINS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 788