From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 1984
104 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

August 6, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.).


Appeal dismissed.

A defendant must obtain permission from a Justice of this court to appeal from an order denying a motion made pursuant to CPL 440.10 or 440.20 (CPL 450.15, 460.15 Crim. Proc.). Defendant has never been granted such leave by this court and, accordingly, his appeal is dismissed. In any event, we note that, on an application to vacate a judgment of conviction the party challenging the conviction's validity bears the burden of coming forth with allegations sufficient to create an issue of fact ( People v Session, 34 N.Y.2d 254). The conclusory allegations presented by defendant herein are insufficient to sustain this burden. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ramsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 1984
104 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Ramsey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THURMAN RAMSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 6, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Warren v. Goord

A defendant does not have an automatic right to appeal from the denial of a CPL § 440.10 motion, and instead…

People v. Watt

Memorandum: We affirm the judgment resentencing defendant. Insofar as his brief on appeal concerns denial of…