From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1983
94 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

May 2, 1983


Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), entered June 18, 1982, which dismissed the defendant's indictment in the interest of justice. Order reversed, on the law, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. A motion to dismiss an indictment must be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the People (CPL 210.45, subd 1; People v Kouzelove, 72 A.D.2d 608; People v Boynton, 67 A.D.2d 982). The procedural requirements of CPL 210.45 apply with equal force to a court which is considering the dismissal of an indictment upon its own motion ( People v Clayton, 41 A.D.2d 204; People v Pichkur, 52 A.D.2d 852; People v Vega, 80 A.D.2d 867; People v Boynton, supra). The failure of Criminal Term to adhere to the procedural requirements of CPL 210.45 in this case requires reversal of the order appealed from. Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1983
94 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

People v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. HECTOR RAMOS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 2, 1983

Citations

94 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

People v. Sullivan, Robinson

In its written decision, however, the court inexplicably stated that the "defendants' motion for dismissal in…

People v. Paredes

However, as the People timely and properly argued below, a post-arraignment motion to dismiss an accusatory…