From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ramirez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-09-25

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis RAMIREZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bruce D. Austern of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David E.A. Crowley of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bruce D. Austern of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David E.A. Crowley of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nunez, J.), entered on or about April 4, 2013, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L. 2005, ch. 243), unanimously affirmed.

The court properly determined that defendant is ineligible for resentencing because he had already been released to parole supervision for his class A–II drug felony conviction at the time he made the instant application ( see People v. Mills, 11 N.Y.3d 527, 537, 872 N.Y.S.2d 705, 901 N.E.2d 196 [2008] ). Accordingly, this Court has no lawful basis upon which to reduce defendant's sentence of 6 years to life on that conviction to a term of 6 years. We have considered and reject defendant's remaining arguments. SWEENY, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ramirez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis RAMIREZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 25, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
120 A.D.3d 1136
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6372

Citing Cases

People v. Horning

Defendant's equal protection and due process objections to the statutory resentencing criteria are…

People v. Bustamante

As defendant was convicted of a class A–II drug felony, County Court correctly considered his application…