From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ralph

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2012
91 A.D.3d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-17

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony RALPH, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Bonnie H. Stein of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Gamaliel Marrero on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Bonnie H. Stein of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Gamaliel Marrero on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), imposed June 3, 2010, which, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on March 19, 2001.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution ( see People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d 621, 630–632, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952; People v. Algarin, 89 A.D.3d 859, 932 N.Y.S.2d 358).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., FLORIO, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ralph

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2012
91 A.D.3d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Ralph

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony RALPH, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
936 N.Y.S.2d 903
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 391

Citing Cases

People v. Pemberton

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his…

People v. John

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. Since the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally…