Opinion
October 7, 1997
Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Donati, J.).
Defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was properly denied. The allocution minutes demonstrate that defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, and that he understood the crime to which he was pleading guilty. Since defendant's motion to withdraw the plea was made on different grounds from those advanced on appeal, defendant has not preserved his present claim that his factual recitations negated an element of the crime, and we see no reason to invoke the limited exception to the preservation requirement set forth in People v. Lopez ( 71 N.Y.2d 662). Defendant's factual recitations, read as a whole and in context of the case ( see, People v McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905), do not cast significant doubt on his guilt ( see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726). Moreover, reduction of defendant's conviction to a lesser included offense, which is the only relief requested on appeal, would not be a lawful remedy ( People v. Vaughn, 119 A.D.2d 779, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 760). Defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rubin, Tom, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.