From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Rabenold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1942
41 N.E.2d 101 (N.Y. 1942)

Opinion

Argued January 19, 1942

Decided March 5, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, WALLACE, J.

Charles H. Tuttle for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Stanley H. Fuld, Whitman Knapp and Richard G. Denzer of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: FINCH, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ., dissent on the ground that sections 304 and 889 of the Penal Law cannot be stretched to cover the acts here charged against the defendant.


Summaries of

People v. Rabenold

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 5, 1942
41 N.E.2d 101 (N.Y. 1942)
Case details for

People v. Rabenold

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELLWOOD M. RABENOLD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 5, 1942

Citations

41 N.E.2d 101 (N.Y. 1942)
41 N.E.2d 101

Citing Cases

People v. Smithtown General Hospital

(d) The register of operations prepared from information submitted by defendant Salzarullo listed Dr. Massoff…

People v. Schwartz

The record establishes that the claims asserted were false and any book entries based on such false claims…