Opinion
503
March 19, 2002.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J. at hearing; Felice Shea, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 3, 1998, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
ELEANOR J. OSTROW, for respondent.
JEFFREY I. RICHMAN, for defendant-appellant.
Before: Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rosenberger, Wallach, JJ.
The suppression motion was properly denied. The court properly found that the showup identification three weeks after the undercover officer's final meeting with defendant in this ongoing investigation was confirmatory. There was no risk of misidentification since the trained and experienced officer had met with defendant for prolonged periods on three prior occasions and grew familiar with his appearance (see, People v. Pipersburg, 273 A.D.2d 77, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 892; People v. Prekuli, 256 A.D.2d 77, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 877; People v. Reyes, 256 A.D.2d 242, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 928). The identification combined features of identifications that are confirmatory because of familiarity between the parties (see, People v. Rodriguez, 79 N.Y.2d 445) and identifications that are confirmatory because they are integral parts of police procedures (see, People v. Wharton, 74 N.Y.2d 921). Furthermore, it was immaterial that another police officer had displayed a single photograph of defendant to the undercover officer following the first meeting, since she met with defendant two more times and the photograph would have had no effect on her ultimate identification, made after she had grown familiar with his face.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.